This assumption is not supported strongly by experimental evidence and does not take into account the variable conformations and microenvironments of chromatin in the nucleus. Single or double BIBW2992 strand breakage of minichromosome DNA by apoptotic or other endogenous nucleases did not appear to be significant during incubation of cells for repair. Supercoiled DNA in non-irradiated cells showed no significant decrease in its level between 0 h and 2 h. In irradiated cells its level remained identical to that in control cells when topoisomerases or PARP were inhibited, but its stability in the presence of putative repair inhibitors could not be measured since they influenced its reformation by repair pathways. The level of linear minichromosome DNA in irradiated cells remained constant when NHEJ was inhibited, with a TWS119 p-value for the difference in level between 0 h and 2 h of 0.55 for wortmannin and 0.88 for NU7441. To inhibit enzymes involved in repair of strand breaks, we used chemical reagents whose specificity has been well established because in most cases siRNA methodology did not provide sufficient depletion of enzymes. In other studies depletion of PARP-1, DNA ligases, and topoisomerase II was also less than complete and in some cases lethal. Inhibitors of PARP-1 showed no effect on the repair of strand breaks in minichromosome DNA. The precise step in which PARP-1 intervenes in repair remains elusive; the current view is that it is not indispensable for repair of single strand breaks in genomic DNA and its role appears to be indirect, for example by binding to breaks and protecting them from further degradation. In another study using our experimental system published while this manuscript was in preparation, knockdown of PARP-1 did not significantly affect repair of single or double strand breaks. A possible role for topoisomerases I or II in DNA repair has been examined in several studies, but in some cases noncatalytic topoisomerase inhibitors were employed which themselves create strand breaks when DNA is deproteinised and therefore cannot provide evidence for a role of topoisomerases in repair. Topological considerations predict that if nucleosomes do not dissociate completely in the neighbourhood of a strand break, the negative superhelicity which results from DNA wrapping on their surface 
would be conserved in the nicked circular and linear forms. Thus after the repair of all breaks, the religated circular form would recover the negative superhelicity of the original circular minichromosome DNA. Our finding that the conversion of linear to supercoiled minichromosome DNA continues at the normal rate when topoisomerases I and II are inhibited by catalytic inhibitors is consistent with this scenario. It appeared paradoxical at first view that repair of double strand breaks in the minichromosome was arrested completely by inhibition of NHEJ, while 20�C30% of the breaks appeared to be repaired by HR as deduced from the effects of inhibiting activation or activity of ATM kinase or depleting Rad51. These findings can be interpreted plausibly by the mechanism which has been proposed to understand similar observations on repair of double strand breaks in genomic DNA, which is reported to be completely inhibited when NHEJ is arrested by the DNA-PKcs inhibitor wortmannin ; trapping of factors involved in NHEJ at DNA extremities is suggested to prevent the access of factors required for HR.